¶2James LaFurn Wheat, pro se.
¶3Donald L. Beckner, U. S. Atty., James Stanley Lemelle, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for respondent-appellee.
¶4Before CLARK, RONEY, and GEE, Circuit Judges:
¶7James LaFurn Wheat pled guilty to a three count indictment alleging that he had possessed a check stolen from the mail, that he forged the check, and that he uttered and published the check. He received a prison sentence totaling twenty-five years. He then filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence, which the district court denied. Wheat appeals the denial of his motion, and we affirm.
¶8Wheat contends that the sentencing judge erred in relying on a false presen-tencing report that stated that Wheat had been arrested on sixty separate occasions prior to his conviction. He also asserts that he cannot be convicted of both forging and uttering a stolen check. He contends that the district court erred in failing to hold a hearing to resolve the factual issues underlying his § 2255 motion.
¶9We have examined each of Wheat’s assignments of error and find them to be without merit.
¶10AFFIRMED.