Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 F.2d 885 - Margoles v. Johns

Margoles v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis

587 F.2d 885 · 1978

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably Carlucci v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (1985), Black Panther Party v. Smith (1981)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

3001978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Flaks v. Koegel · In Re Professional Hockey Antitrust Litigation. (d.c. No. M.D.L. 119) Appeal of Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. And Golden Blades Hockey, Inc. (Six Cases). World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 72--1995) v. National Hockey League World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 73--19) v. Nassau Sports, Etc. (Two Cases). Nassau Sports, a Limited Partnership, (d.c. Civ. No. 74--162) v. Garry Peters and Golden Blades Hockey, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant (Two Cases) · Louis Sapiro, Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated August 26, 1966 v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The record establishes that the deadline for the production of documents was personally communicated to the plaintiff, and his son, and that it was a current, not a long prior forgotten order. The record further establishes that the plaintiff had turned over to his son the basic task of producing the requested documents and that those tardily produced were in fact in Perry’s possession. In this case, however, the district court was amply justified in treating the failure of the son as that of the plaintiff. Since Perry was the “alter ego” of his father for purposes of documentary production, the court considers the failure of the non-party as that of the party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.