Gourdet v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
587 F.3d 1 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Pierre v. Attorney General of United States · Pierre v. Gonzales · Elien v. Ashcroft · Conteh v. Gonzales · J-E
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a [qualifying] criminal offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Sessions“eligible ... for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture [CAT]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Sessions“specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.