Phillips v. Humble’s Empirical Analysis
587 F.3d 1267 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Felder v. Casey · Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Company · United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. · Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co. · Williams v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the requirement that claimants give notice of their claim is a reasonable restriction that applies equally to all persons wishing to sue the government.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.