Hunter v. Ferrell’s Empirical Analysis
587 F.3d 1304 · 2009
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lawrence v. Florida · Sandvik v. United States · Drew v. Department of Corrections · Nara v. Frank · Webster v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he alleged mental impairment must have affected the petitioner’s ability to file a timely habeas petition.”); McSwain v. Davis, 287 Fed.Appx. 450, 456 (6th Cir.2008) (same); Laws v. Lamarque, 351 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir.2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.