Watson v. Geren’s Empirical Analysis
587 F.3d 156 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Orloff v. Willoughby · Witmer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Given that the panel's decision does not seek to depart from existing standards, the issue presented by this appeal is not properly considered a `question of exceptional importance' within the meaning of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fact that this issue arises so infrequently lends credence to our view that en banc review is not `necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. (citing and quoting United States v. American-Foreign S.S. Corp., 363 U.S. 685, 689 , 80 S.Ct. 1336 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1491 (1960)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.