United States v. Linderman’s Empirical Analysis
587 F.3d 896 · 2009
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from South Dakota District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Sells v. United States · United States v. Feemster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a 'reasonable probability,' based on the appellate record as a whole, that but for the error he would have received a more favorable sentence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.