587 F. Supp. 2d 225 - Khadr v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
11 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 950G (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 950J (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Reid v. Covert · Schlesinger v. Councilman · United States Ex Rel. Toth v. Quarles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not appropriate in cases in which individuals raise substantial arguments denying the right of the military to try them at all, and in which the legal challenge turns on the status of the persons as to whom the military asserted its power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that even if there is some lawful basis for his detention, he cannot be detained ... as an adult because he was a juvenile at the time of capture.” Khadr, 587 F.Supp.2d at 229-30 . It found that this argument was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Khadr v. Obama“are entitled to the privilege of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their detention”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.