Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 N.W.2d 23 - State v. Nerz

State v. Nerz’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Maurstad (2007), Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. (2001)

29 state decisions

2501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Willis · Mold v. Iofredo · State v. Nerz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The day of the act or event from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. When a period of time prescribed or allowed is seven days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundáys and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation. 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whenever a party has the right or is required to do an act within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party and the notice or other paper is served upon the party by mail, three days shall be added to the prescribed period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.