Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 N.W.2d 764 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2019

7 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brotherton · State v. Peterson · State v. Kern · State v. McGonigle · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When two or more persons act together and knowingly commit a crime, each is responsible for the other’s acts during the commission of the crime or escape from the scene. The Defendant’s guilt is the same as the other person’s(s’) unless the act(s) could not reasonably be expected to be done in aiding the commission of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily the striking of improper testimony cures any error. Only in extreme instances where it is manifest that the prejudicial effect of the evidence on the jury remained, despite its exclusion, and influenced the jury is the defendant denied a fair trial and entitled to a [mistrial].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] reversal may only be predicated on the proposition that the matter forbidden by the ruling was so prejudicial that its effect upon the jury could not be erased by the trial court's admonition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.