587 So. 2d 1193 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State (2002), 614 So. 2d 888 - Lockett v. State (1992)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Finley · 560 So. 2d 148 - Schmitt v. State · 539 So. 2d 1375 - McClendon v. State · 524 So. 2d 957 - May v. State · 556 So. 2d 1059 - Moore v. Ruth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] criminal defendant has neither a state nor a federal constitutional right to appointed counsel in post-conviction proceedings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he acquittal on the criminal charge means at the very least that, before the accused's parole may be revoked, the State must offer actual proof that he committed an act violating the terms and conditions of his parole, and the mere fact that he was arrested and charged with rape may hardly suffice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]efore one released on parole may be returned to custody, it must be shown that he has violated the terms and conditions of parole. Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp. 1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.