Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 SO2D 236 - Cooper v. Crabb

Cooper v. Crabb’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 753 So. 2d 1057 - McNeil v. Hester (2000), 764 So. 2d 373 - City of Jackson v. Perry (2000)

94 state decisions

500199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 525 So. 2d 746 - UHS-Qualicare, Inc. v. GULF COAST COM. HOSP., INC. · 515 So. 2d 1183 - Mullins v. Ratcliff · Commerce Trust Co. v. Watts · 501 So. 2d 416 - Cherry v. Anthony, Gibbs, Sage · Chippendale v. North Adams Savings Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal this Court will not reverse a Chancery Court's findings, be they of ultimate fact or of evidentiary fact, where there is substantial evidence supporting those findings.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Notwithstanding our respect for and deference to the trial judge, on matters of law it is our job to get it right. That the trial judge may have come close is not good enough.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Where the language of a legal text is without gross ambiguity, neither parol testimony nor other extrinsic evidence are admissible to show meaning.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.