Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 SO2D 353 - King v. King

King v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 485 So. 2d 1174 - Lutz v. Lutz · Nowell v. Nowell · Wiggins v. Wiggins · Prestwood v. Prestwood · Turner v. Clutts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"For such an abuse of discretion the judgment of the trial court must be and hereby is set aside insofar as the `Real Property Division.' The rest and remainder is affirmed. "This court will not direct a specific property division in this case, but remands the matter to the trial court to render a proper and equitable division. It is suggested that a reasonable solution might provide for the carving from the whole property the home, unencumbered, as an award to the wife."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.