Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 So. 2d 359 - Culpepper v. State

587 So. 2d 359 - Culpepper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2017

13 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blankenship v. Blankenship · 555 So. 2d 1086 - Moynes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"1. The Court finds from the evidence that the subject 1984 Toyota Supra ... was used to facilitate a violation of the Alabama Controlled Substances Law and is due to be forfeited to the State. "2. The Court finds and determines from the evidence that the Defendant, Kimberly Robbs, a/k/a Kimberly Hobbs, is the owner of the 1984 Toyota Supra. The Court further finds that the Defendant, Kimberly Robbs, a/k/a Kimberly Hobbs, had knowledge that the 1984 Toyota Supra was being used to facilitate a violation of Alabama Controlled Substances Law. The Defendant, Kimberly Robbs, failed to meet her burden to prove that the violation of Alabama Controlled Substances Statutes [was] committed without her knowledge or consent and/or that she could not have obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence, knowledge of the intended illegal use of her property and prevented such use."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “should have put Culpepper on notice that . . . [her vehicle] would be used for drug purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.