Bell v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 570 So. 2d 1347 - Eckroade v. Eckroade · 551 So. 2d 587 - Massis v. Massis · 578 So. 2d 890 - Huntley v. Huntley · Interest of J.R.S. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven taking into account the former husband's more limited needs for income during his incarceration and the trauma he has inflicted on his family through his intergenerational acts of sexual exploitation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he order on appeal reflects a disparate distribution which is not clearly tied to appellant's dissipation of assets or reasonably anticipated debits visited on the former wife.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the scheme of distribution affected by the judgment ranged somewhere between a 60/40 and 75/25 weighted share in favor of appellee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.