¶1Jerry Siplin has appealed the order of the trial court denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm, without prejudice to Siplin’s right to assert the alleged deficiencies regarding his sentencing in a properly framed rule 3.850 motion. See Caristi v. State, 578 So.2d 769, 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
587 So. 2d 675
Siplin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 25, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-10-25
Relies on 578 So. 2d 769 - Caristi v. State
Decided 1991-10-25