State, DOTD v. Tatman’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 572 So. 2d 39 - State Through DOTD v. Estate of Davis · Pickering v. Washington · State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Townsend · 568 So. 2d 657 - State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The judgment rendered therein shall include, as part of the just compensation awarded, legal interest on the amount finally awarded as of the date title vests in the plaintiff to the date of payment, but interest shall not be allowed on so much thereof as has been deposited in the registry of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the amount finally awarded for compensation exceeds the amount deposited, the judgment shall include legal interest on the excess from the date of legal demand until paid, but such interest shall not accrue on any award made for expert fees or attorney fees prior to judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[l]egal interest is a matter of substantive law and a change in the law that alters an award of legal interest should not be given retroactive effect unless the legislature so provides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.