Wright v. Fardo’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. Finn · Ratliff v. Redmon · Holman Enterprise Tobacco Warehouse v. Carter · Wallins Creek Lumber Co. v. Blanton · Crush v. Kaelin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Employments not within act, or not insured. In case of concurrent employments, each employment considered must be such as would come within the scope of the act; and where in his employment by one employer the employee is not covered by compensation insurance, his salary therein will not be included with his salary in another employment with another employer, in which he is covered by such insurance, in determining the basis of the payment of compensation for an injury in the latter employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hale v. Aluminum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.