Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 587 SW2D 403 - Cruise v. State

Cruise v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Thomas v. State (1981), Bynum v. State (1989)

36 state decisions

29019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Drumm v. State · Haecker v. State · Posey v. State · Boney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Everything should be stated in an indictment which is necessary to be proved.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is clear that it was necessary for the State to prove the manner in which appellant caused bodily injury to complainant, in order to meet its burden of proof. While allegation of the manner and means of causing bodily injury under Section 29.02(a)(1) is not a fundamental requisite of charging the offense for purposes of invoking the district court’s jurisdiction, [compare Posey v. State, 545 S.W.2d 162 (Tex.Cr.App.1977)], appellant’s motion to quash entitled him to the allegation of facts sufficient to bar a subsequent prosecution for the same offense and sufficient to give him precise notice of the offense with which he was charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “On the 3rd day of March, 1981, in Galveston County, Texas, I did then and there while in the course of committing theft and with intent to appropriate and maintain control of property of Jeannette Garcia and with intent to deprive the said owner Jeanette Garcia of said property, did then and there by using and exhibiting a deadly weapon, to wit: a knife, intentionally and knowingly threaten and place Jeannette Garcia in fear of imminent bodily injury and death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.