Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2016
1 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Weaver v. Graham · Penry v. Lynaugh · Dobbert v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny ground for relief that was formerly adjudicated, whether in the proceedings leading to the judgment of conviction, in an appeal, in a postconviction proceeding, or in a federal habeas corpus proceeding, is thereafter barred, unless reconsideration of the claim is warranted in the interest of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. GUDZELAK v. State“[t]he first inquiry in any analysis of a postconviction relief claim is whether the petition meets the procedural requirements of Rule 61”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. GUDZELAK v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.