Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 A.2d 310 - State v. McKinney

State v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. True · State v. Goodall · State v. Huff · State v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A person is guilty of unlawful trafficking in a scheduled drug if the person intentionally or knowingly trafficks in what the person knows or believes to be a scheduled drug and that is in fact a scheduled drug. 2. Violation of this section is: A. A Class B crime if the drug is a schedule W drug, if it is marijuana in a quantity of 20 pounds or more or if it is marijuana and the person grows or cultivates 500 or more plants; B. A Class C crime if the drug is a schedule X drug, if it is marijuana in a quantity of one pound or if it is marijuana and the person grows or cultivates 100 or more plants; C.A Class D crime if the drug is a schedule Y drug or a schedule Z drug.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.