Helm v. Jago’s Empirical Analysis
588 F.2d 1180 · 1979
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2007
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Cunningham · Thompson v. Bannan · 6 Ohio St. 2d 202 - Whitaker v. Maxwell · Helm v. Jago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The release of an accused by one sovereign to another, so that the receiving sovereignty may enforce its criminal laws against him, does not constitute a waiver of jurisdiction over the accused, nor does it estop the releasing state from subsequently either enforcing a previously imposed sentence or subjecting the accused to further criminal proceedings. Murphy v. Maxwell (1964), 176 Ohio St. 297 , 199 N.E.2d 597 ; Guerrieri v. Maxwell (1962), 174 Ohio St. 40 , 186 N.E.2d 614 ; Heston v. Green (1963), 174 Ohio St. 291 , 189 N.E.2d 86 , Tomkalski v. Maxwell (1963), 175 Ohio St. 377 , 194 N.E.2d 845 ; Whitaker v. Maxwell (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d 202 , 217 N.E.2d 223 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.