Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 F.2d 1281 - Lee v. Blumenthal

Lee v. Blumenthal’s Empirical Analysis

588 F.2d 1281 · 1979

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Beller v. Middendorf (1980), Lonsdale v. United States (1990)

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

37019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Hill v. United States · 50 F. Supp. 73 - United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for compliance. Nothing here in (1) affects Other limitatinnc nn inrlieial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought. 28 U.S.C. § 1331 now provides: The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,-000, exclusive of interest and costs, and arises under the Constitution, laws, or treati”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “founded upon ... any regulation of an executive department”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.