Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 F.2d 287 - Small v. Olympic Prefabricators, Inc.

Small v. Olympic Prefabricators, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

588 F.2d 287 · 1978

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
January 1984
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Patterson v. United States · Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · DeCosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Timmins v. Hale · Kendall v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “factual findings of the magistrate adopted by the district court (are) subject to the clearly erroneous standard of Rule 53(a), . . . the legal decision of the magistrate (is) subject to the full review of this court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.