Almeida v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
588 F.3d 778 · 2009
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 165 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Bell v. United States · Dolan v. City of Tigard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not only the right to actual possession of a thing, but also the right to exclude others from possessing it, the right to use it and receive income from its use, the right to transmit it to another, and the right to sell, alienate, waste, or even destroy it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in Constitutional Analysis Today , 56 Wash. L. Rev. 583 , 589 (1981) ). Both the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.