Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 NE2D 527 - Morrison v. State

Morrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Yamanis v. United States · Good Hope Chemical Corp. Creditors' Committee v. Koerver · Lawrence v. State · Palmer v. State · Fox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute defining the offense of Murder, I.C. 85-42-1-1, reads in pertinent parts: (1) A person who knowingly or intentionally kills another human being ... commits murder, a felony. 1.0. 85-41-1-14 defines "human being" to mean "an individual who has been born and is alive." The statute defining the offense of Attempt to Commit Murder with which the Defendant is charged reads in pertinent parts: Indiana Code 85-41-5-1 A person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, he engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime. An attempt to commit a crime is a felony or misdemeanor of the same class as the crime attempted. However, an attempt to commit murder is a Class A Felony. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, with intent to kill the victim, engaged in conduct which was a substantial step toward such killing. To convict the Defendant of Count I, Attempt to Commit Murder, the State must prove each of the following essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt: That Jerry C. Wilson (1) did engage in conduct that constituted a substantial step toward commission of the crime of Murder (2) by knowingly or intentionally at taching a bomb to the car being utilized by William McKay (3) in an attempt to kill him If the State fails to prove any of the elements for Count I, Attempt to Commit Murder, a Class A Felony, beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “can be negated by a showing that a sufficient”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.