588 So. 2d 1076 - Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 384 So. 2d 279 - Lawrence v. Lawrence · 351 So. 2d 47 - Krueger v. State · 67 So. 2d 218 - Florida Ventilated Awning Co. v. Dickson · American Pioneer Cas. Ins. Co. v. Henrion · 415 So. 2d 79 - Rowe v. Wille
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court may not hold an individual in contempt of court for violating an order which does not clearly and definitely make the person aware of its command and direction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Braisted v. State“that he or she was guilty of such gross dereliction that the intent will be presumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.