Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 So. 2d 267 - Rhodes v. Easkold

588 So. 2d 267 - Rhodes v. Easkold’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. State · In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship) · Morey v. Harper · Faucher v. RCF DEVELOPERS · 343 So. 2d 1305 - Horowitz v. American Motorist Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`unless appropriate questions are put to the doctor specifically inquiring about the effect of the false or omitted information on the doctor's previously expressed opinion.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “failed to specifically ask Drs. VerVoort and Flynn at their depositions whether their opinions would have been different had they known Mrs. Rhodes' complete medical history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “justified in determining that the opinion testimony was flawed by reason of the materially untruthful history given [to the doctors] by the claimant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.