Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 SO2D 551 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2016

21 state decisions

140199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Day v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the resolution of conflicting testimony [is] for the jury's determination”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The husband-wife privilege ‘ “has for its object the security from apprehension of disclosure — a security in consequence of which confidences will be freely given and not withheld.” ’ Brown v. State, 588 So.2d 551, 556 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991) (quoting Handley v. State, 515 So.2d 121, 125 (Ala.Crim.App.1987), quoting in turn -8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2837 (McNaughton rev.1961)). “ ‘The confidential communication privilege between spouses applies to “knowledge acquired, by one spouse’s observation of an act of the other spouse in private if the circumstances indicate the actor-spouse did the act in the presence of the other spouse solely because of the confidence normally inspired by the marriage relation.” ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.