Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 SO2D 778 - State v. Philippoff

State v. Philippoff’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Place · United States v. Jacobsen · Jizmejian v. United States · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The affidavit stated that approximately an hour after learning that the package had been received at the Main Post Office, an investigating inspector had been advised by the post office in New York that the return address of M & S Art Supply, 7 Clinton Street, New York City, NY 10002 was fictitious. The package had been placed with several other packages, and two certified narcotics detection dogs had separately”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fit the profile of an ongoing Inspection Service Express Mail Narcotics investigation, which includes fictitious return addresses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.