Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 SW2D 593 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2004

6 state decisions

401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State of Louisiana Francis v. Resweber · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Estelle v. Dorrough · Freeman v. State · People v. Prante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A de facto officer is one who has the reputation of being the officer, and yet is not a good officer in point of law; in other words, the de facto officer is one who acts under color of a known and valid appointment, but has failed to conform to some precedent requirement, as to take the oath, give a bond, or the like.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.