Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 SW2D 945 - Stanfield v. State

Stanfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Traylor v. State · Wester v. State · Furrh v. State · Wallace v. State · Sappington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . .it follows that when a revocation proceeding had been had and the defendant continued on probation in the discretion of the court (although there was an adequate basis for revocation demonstrated at the hearing), the continuation cannot subsequently be arbitrarily withdrawn at the whim of the trial court or upon mere fact of arrest. To hold otherwise would violate due process, due course of the law of the land and fundamental fairness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““. . . after a hearing without a jury [the trial court] may either continue, modify, or revoke the probation. . . The court may continue the hearing for good cause shown by either the defendant or the state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.