United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
588 U.S. 445 · 2019
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Erlinger v. United States (2024), DeGuelle v. Camilli (2013)
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2332B (§ 702 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 858 (§ 417 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“during and in relation to any crime of violence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“crime of violence or drug trafficking crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.