Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 F.2d 1232 - Shore v. Califano

Shore v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis

589 F.2d 1232 · 1978

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Hollman v. Department of Health & Human Services (1982), Yoder v. Harris (1981)

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

18019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 413 (§ 213 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 414 (§ 214 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Brewer v. United States · Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. · James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America · Breeden v. Weinberger · Rasmussen v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “filed a tax return of his self-employment income for such year before the expiration of the time limitation following such year, in which case the Secretary shall include in his records the self-employment income of such individual for such year.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Reporting: Contributions and benefits would be based on income from self-employment. For both the self-employed person and the Government, the simplest way of reporting such income is as part of the income-tax return. “Net income from self-employment: Net income from self-employment would be determined entirely on the basis of two figures already included in the income-tax return, namely, income from business or profession (Schedule C), and income from partnerships (Schedule E).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he absence of an entry in the [Secretary’s] records as to the self-employment income alleged to have been derived by an individual in such year shall be conclusive ... that no such alleged self-employment income was derived by such individual in such year unless it is shown that he [or she] filed a tax return of his [or her] self-employment income for such year before the expiration- of the time limitation following such year....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.