Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 F.2d 1335 - Osh Oshd Establishment Inspection of Gilbert Bennett Manufacturing Company Routh Marshall v. Chromalloy American Corporation

Osh Oshd Establishment Inspection of Gilbert Bennett Manufacturing Company Routh Marshall v. Chromalloy American Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

589 F.2d 1335 · 1979

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Gomez v. United States (1989), 123 Wash. 2d 260 - City of Seattle v. McCready (1994)

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

75019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determine[ ] that there are reasonable grounds to believe that [a] violation or danger exists....”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “would be imposing on the Secretary an unwarranted 'consumption of enforcement energies' which would 'exceed manageable proportions. . . . Such a situation was not intended by the Supreme Court in its decision in Barlow's.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The only limitations on section 636(b)(3) are that the duties be consistent with the Constitution and federal laws and that they not be specifically excluded by section 636(b)(1).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.