Osh Oshd Establishment Inspection of Gilbert Bennett Manufacturing Company Routh Marshall v. Chromalloy American Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
589 F.2d 1335 · 1979
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Gomez v. United States (1989), 123 Wash. 2d 260 - City of Seattle v. McCready (1994)
55 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine[ ] that there are reasonable grounds to believe that [a] violation or danger exists....”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“would be imposing on the Secretary an unwarranted 'consumption of enforcement energies' which would 'exceed manageable proportions. . . . Such a situation was not intended by the Supreme Court in its decision in Barlow's.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2055, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,790 in the Matter of Establishment Inspection of Stoddard Lumber Company, Inc., 1/4 Mile South of City of Yellowstone Highway, St. Anthony, Idaho, Petitioner v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Respondent · In re Search Warrant for the Commissioner of Labor to Inspect the Premises of J & P Custom Plating, Inc.“The only limitations on section 636(b)(3) are that the duties be consistent with the Constitution and federal laws and that they not be specifically excluded by section 636(b)(1).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.