Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

589 F.2d 1370

Docket No. 75-1616.

United California Bank v. United States of America

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1979-01-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on United California Bank v. United States · Ritzau v. Warm Springs West

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-01-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2006

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dennis M. Donohue (argued), of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.

Ronald E. Gother (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

¶1

This case has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court, 99 S.Ct. 476, for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion.

¶2

We remand to the District Court for the Central District of California to compute the refund and interest to which the taxpayer is entitled and to enter judgment therefor all in a manner in conformity with the Supreme Court's opinion.

/589/f2d/1370 · .json · Public domain