Boostrom v. Bach’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rodgers ex rel. Jones v. Bowen · Elles v. Industrial Commission · Brady v. EASTERN INDIANA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASS'N · 159 Ind. App. 266 - Seastrom, Inc. v. Amick Construction Co., Inc. · 51 Ill. App. 3d 1048 - Hanks v. Floyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for each small claims action the clerk shall collect from the party filing the action a small claims costs fee of thirty dollars ($30).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boostrom v. Bach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.