Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 N.W.2d 466 - State v. Chambers

State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Bauer (1999), State v. Martin (2009)

33 state decisions

190199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Furman v. Georgia · Woodson v. North Carolina · Trop v. Dulles · McCleskey v. Kemp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he jury go[es] outside their province as triers of the facts if they include the matter of punishment in their deliberations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the jury believed all of the state's witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.