Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 P2D 1073 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2009

17 state decisions

1501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Agurs · Roulston v. State · Atnip v. State · Kovash v. State · Gaines v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant must not only object to alleged improper remarks, he must go further and move the court to exclude such remarks from the consideration of the jury, unless the error could not be cured by a withdrawal of the remarks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.