Stauffer v. Call’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2011
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Buyers agree] to purchase the following described real property, situate in the county of Washington, State of Utah, to-wit: Anderson’s Junction. More particularly described as follows: SEE enclosed legal description. [Buyers] to purchase two houses using the natural bounderies [sic], which is approximately 10 acres collectively PLUS approsmately [sic] ⅛⅛ water rights. [Seller] to retain the fenced natural farm ground on the SE (south side from Interstate Freeway) which is approximately 40 acres PLUS % water rights. The remaining ground SE of the old highway to be [buyers’] along with the two houses. [Buyers] to purchase lh of all remaining property to be owned as tenents [sic] in common with [seller]. 5”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnard v. Barnard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.