Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

589 So. 2d 1048

Muro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 1991

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-12-18

Relies on 559 So. 2d 105 - Zachary v. State

Decided 1991-12-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm defendant’s conviction for attempted possession of cocaine.

¶2However, we agree with defendant that conditions 11, 12, 13, and 18 of the conditions of probation imposed in his sentence had not been orally pronounced by the trial court and are, therefore, not properly a part of the sentence. See Zachary v. State, 559 So.2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

¶3We do not find merit in defendant’s remaining contention concerning the award of fees and costs which had been agreed to by defendant as a part of his plea bargain.

¶4The conviction is affirmed. The sentence is remanded for correction in accordance with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
/589/so2d/1048 · .json · Public domain