Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 So. 2d 1370 - Johnson v. State

589 So. 2d 1370 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 507 So. 2d 1080 - Smith v. Department of Ins. · State v. Jimeno · 557 So. 2d 899 - Caracciolo v. State · 583 So. 2d 1033 - Wright v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “WHETHER THE CHAPTER 89-280 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 775.084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR TO THEIR RE-ENACTMENT AS PART OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES, BECAUSE [THEY WERE] IN VIOLATION OF THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The title of the act at issue designates it an act relating to criminal law and procedure. The first three sections of the act amend section 775.084, Florida Statutes, pertaining to habitual felony offenders; section 775.0842, Florida Statutes, pertaining to career criminal prosecutions; and section 775.0843, Florida Statutes, pertaining to policies for career criminal cases. Sections four through eleven of the act pertain to the Chapter 493 provisions governing private investigation and patrol services, specifically, repossession of motor vehicles and motorboats.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “difficult to discern a logical or natural connection between career criminal sentencing and repossession of motor vehicles by private investigators.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.