Daughtry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Ex Parte State of Alabama · 437 So. 2d 1375 - Barker v. State · Ex Parte Hawkins · 461 So. 2d 1339 - Ex Parte State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he disciplinary [in Barker] rested upon the board’s opinion that the seized material was a specific contraband — marijuana — possession of which would have possible far-reaching and significant consequences, [(i.e. possible free world prosecution)] whereas in [Daughtry ], the board’s opinion was that the unidentified seized material was merely something not authorized by the department of corrections.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.