589 So. 2d 781 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 33 later decisions

states following

February 2018

most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State (1997), 607 So. 2d 361 - Chevere v. State (1992)

33 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, NAACP · Miller v. Haynes · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Rosenblatt v. Baer · Skelton v. City of Birmingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[A] trial court's ruling based upon conflicting evidence given at a suppression hearing is binding on this Court, and is not to be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Jude · Witcher v. State
“'[w]eight and credibility to be attached to the testimony of witnesses at a suppression hearing is a question for the trial judge.' Kitchens v. State , 445 So.2d 1000 , 1002 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Miller v. State · 655 So. 2d 1074 - Smiley v. State
“A refusal of admittance need not be expressed and 'will oftentimes be present only by implication.' Laffitte v. State , 370 So.2d 1108 , 1110 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 370 So.2d 1111 (Ala. 1979) (quoting McClure v. United States , 332 F.2d 19 , 22 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 945 , 85 S.Ct. 1027 , 13 L.Ed.2d 963 (1965)). '[I]f the occupants of the dwelling fail to respond within a reasonable time, refusal can be presumed.' Irwin v. State , 415 So.2d 1181 , 1183 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 971 , 103 S.Ct. 302 , 74 L.Ed.2d 283 (1982). 'What constitutes a "reasonable time”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Witcher v. State · 650 So. 2d 966 - Ex Parte State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.