Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 494 So. 2d 1143 - Lambrix v. State · 352 So. 2d 140 - In Re Marriage of Johnson · Haas v. Haas · McConnell v. McConnell · 484 So. 2d 1277 - Waskin v. Waskin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be warranted upon changed circumstances which are substantive, material, involuntary and permanent in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Manning v. Manning“for example, permitting a thriving business to be closed down and making no effort to find other employment...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.