Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 589 SW2D 66 - Garner v. Jones

Garner v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stephens v. Kansas City Gas Company · Hamre v. Conger · Chester v. Shockley · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Jessee · Penn v. Hartman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But I want to read you one more jury instruction. And I want you to listen to this instruction and go back upstairs and see what you can do, and then we’ll see what happens. “You should make every reasonable effort to reach a verdict as it is desirable that there be a verdict in every case. Each of you should respect the opinions of your fellow jurors as you would have them respect yours and, in a spirit of tolerance and understanding, endeavor to bring the deliberations of the whole jury to an agreement upon a verdict. Do not be afraid to change your opinion if the discussion persuades you that you should. But a juror should not agree to a verdict that violates the instructions of the Court.” And with that one additional instruction, I’d just like to ask you to go upstairs and see if you are able to reach a ver- diet. And I’ll expect to hear something from you. And I see the smiles. Thank you.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.