Bedgood v. Madalin’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re King's Estate · Dillon v. Legg · Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc. · 19 Cal. 3d 59 - Krouse v. Graham · Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. Takasaki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Whether plaintiff was located near the scene of the accident as contrasted with one who was a distance away from it. (2) Whether the shock resulted from a direct emotional impact upon plaintiff from the sensory and contemporaneous observance of the accident. (3) Whether plaintiff and the victim were closely related, as contrasted with an absence of any relationship or the presence of only a distant relationship.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Now come James Hamilton Bedgood and Robert E. Sorenson, Defendants, and file this their Admission of Liability for such damages as the jury may determine resulted to Plaintiffs from the accident of September 14, 1974, described in Plaintiffs' petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bedgood v. Madalin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.