Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 A3D 693 - State v. Cory J. Roberts

State v. Cory J. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Butcher · United States v. Jefferson · United States v. Pimienta-Redondo · United States v. Henry · United States v. Bentley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur authority to review a trial justice's decision on such a motion is extremely limited and should be exercised only when the sentence is without justification * * * and grossly disparate from other sentences generally imposed for similar offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen faced with the interpretation of statutes and court rules upon review of a Rule 35 motion * * * we apply a de novo standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “well established that [d]ecisions concerning Rule 35 motions are within the sound discretion of the trial justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.