In Re Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2004
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322
Relies on Perez. v. Campbell · Di Pierro v. Taddeo · Federal Land Bank v. Glenn · Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings Ass'n · 10 1280 69929 Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the language of Congress indicates a policy requiring a result not reached under state law, the Supremacy Clause does not permit state law to interfere with the intended result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rescue the benefit of their respective bargains”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the underlying expectations of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.