People v. Shipp’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
74 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably 11 Cal. 3d 531 - Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974), 63 Cal. 2d 779 - People v. Smith (1966)
74 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 47 Cal. 2d 566 - People v. Riser · 50 Cal. 2d 812 - Priestly v. Superior Court · 56 Cal. 2d 720 - People v. Love · 53 Cal. 2d 803 - People v. Duncan · 51 Cal. 2d 177 - In Re Petersen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provisions of section 190.1 establishing the bifurcated trial are mandatory, and their constitutionality is settled. ( People v. Love, 56 Cal.2d 720, 725 [ 16 Cal. Rptr. 777 , 17 Cal. Rptr. 481 , 366 P.2d 33, 809 ]; People v. Corwin, 52 Cal.2d 404, 407 [ 340 P.2d 626 ]; People v. Duncan, 51 Cal.2d 523, 529 [ 334 P.2d 858 ]; People v. Feldkamp, 51 Cal.2d 237, 240-241 [ 331 P.2d 632 ]; People v. Ward, 50 Cal.2d 702, 706-711 [ 328 P.2d 777 , 76 A.L.R.2d 911 ]; Ward v. State of California, (9th Cir.1959) 269 F.2d 906 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.